- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R V2.0 vs TIKI
Fenix E03R V2.0 vs Nitecore TIKI
What E03R V2.0 does better (4) and where TIKI wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03R V2.0TIKI
| E03R V2.0 | TIKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 56.5 mm | −4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 15 mm | +11 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 12 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R V2.0 better than TIKI?
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 130 mAh3.1×
- Maximum output500 lm vs 300 lm+67%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)90 m vs 71 m+27%
- Peak beam intensity2,020 cd vs 1,260 cd+60%
Why is TIKI better than E03R V2.0?
- Weight30 g vs 12 g2.5×
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 40 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,020 cd | 1,260 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 90 m | 71 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Osram P8 |
| LED maker | — | Osram |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 4,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 130 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 40 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 56.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 15 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | — |
| Weight | 30 g | 12 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Grey | Grey |
