- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R V2.0 vs TUP2
Fenix E03R V2.0 vs Nitecore TUP2
What E03R V2.0 does better (2) and where TUP2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is E03R V2.0 better than TUP2?
- Weight30 g vs 58 g+93%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
Why is TUP2 better than E03R V2.0?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 1,200 lm2.4×
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 190 h6.3×
- Peak beam intensity2,020 cd vs 3,910 cd+94%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)90 m vs 125 m+39%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,020 cd | 3,910 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 90 m | 125 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 4 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 190 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP54 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | — |
| Weight | 30 g | 58 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
