- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E04R vs E20 V2.0
Fenix E04R vs Fenix E20 V2.0
What E04R does better (1) and where E20 V2.0 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E04RE20 V2.0
| E04R | E20 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 58.5 mm | 127 mm | −68.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 21 mm | +9 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.8 mm | 16.8 mm | +13 mm |
| Weight | 41 g | 42 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E04R better than E20 V2.0?
- Weight41 g vs 42 g+2%
Why is E20 V2.0 better than E04R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)46 m vs 126 m2.7×
- Peak beam intensity530 cd vs 3,970 cd7.5×
- Maximum runtime87 h vs 200 h2.3×
- Maximum output300 lm vs 350 lm+17%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 350 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 530 cd | 3,970 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 46 m | 126 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-12 | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AA |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | 200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 58.5 mm | 127 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 21 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.8 mm | 16.8 mm |
| Weight | 41 g | 42 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
