- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E04R vs HL17R
Fenix E04R vs Fenix HL17R
What E04R does better (1) and where HL17R wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E04RHL17R
| E04R | HL17R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 58.5 mm | 69.9 mm | −11.4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 40.4 mm | −10.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.8 mm | 37 mm | −7.2 mm |
| Weight | 41 g | 65 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E04R better than HL17R?
- Weight41 g vs 65 g+59%
Why is HL17R better than E04R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)46 m vs 100 m2.2×
- Peak beam intensity530 cd vs 2,500 cd4.7×
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 1,000 mAh2.5×
- Maximum output300 lm vs 500 lm+67%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Maximum runtime87 h vs 96 h+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 530 cd | 2,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 46 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-12 | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | 96 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 58.5 mm | 69.9 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 40.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.8 mm | 37 mm |
| Weight | 41 g | 65 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
