- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E04R vs Oclip 2 Pro
Fenix E04R vs Olight Oclip 2 Pro
What E04R does better (1) and where Oclip 2 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Brightness & throw3.0
4.8Battery & charging6.2
5.4Build & durability4.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is E04R better than Oclip 2 Pro?
- Weight41 g vs 76 g+85%
Why is Oclip 2 Pro better than E04R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)46 m vs 125 m2.7×
- Maximum output300 lm vs 530 lm+77%
- Maximum runtime87 h vs 144 h+66%
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 600 mAh+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 530 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 530 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 46 m | 125 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-12 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 3 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | 144 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx6 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 58.5 mm | 60.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 41 g | 76 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
