- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E09R vs WF05E Intrinsically Safe
Fenix E09R vs Fenix WF05E Intrinsically Safe
What E09R does better (4) and where WF05E Intrinsically Safe wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Brightness & throw2.2
9.5Build & durability9.5
7.9Light quality2.6
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
E09RWF05E Intrinsically Safe
| E09R | WF05E Intrinsically Safe | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 79 mm | 134.5 mm | −55.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 19 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 18.4 mm | 14.9 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Weight | 45 g | 37 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E09R better than WF05E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 85 lm7.1×
- Peak beam intensity2,070 cd vs 730 cd2.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)91 m vs 54 m+69%
- Brightness levels5 vs 3+67%
Why is WF05E Intrinsically Safe better than E09R?
- Weight45 g vs 37 g+22%
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 80 h+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 85 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,070 cd | 730 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 91 m | 54 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | 134.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 18.4 mm | 14.9 mm |
| Weight | 45 g | 37 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 3 |
| Switch | Side switch | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
