- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E09R vs UV
Fenix E09R vs Format UV
What E09R does better (3) and where UV wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E09RUV
| E09R | UV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 79 mm | 159 mm | −80 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 28 mm | −8.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E09R better than UV?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 300 lm2×
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 20 h3.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)91 m vs 80 m+14%
Why is UV better than E09R?
UV has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,070 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 91 m | 80 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | 159 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 28 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 18.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 45 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
