- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E09R vs CH35
Fenix E09R vs GP CH35
What E09R does better (2) and where CH35 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is E09R better than CH35?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 60 h+17%
Why is CH35 better than E09R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)91 m vs 130 m+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,070 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 91 m | 130 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 18.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 45 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Green |
