- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E09R vs TINI 2
Fenix E09R vs Nitecore TINI 2
What E09R does better (4) and where TINI 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E09RTINI 2
| E09R | TINI 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 79 mm | 47 mm | +32 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 25 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Weight | 45 g | 22 g | +23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E09R better than TINI 2?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 280 mAh2.9×
- Maximum output600 lm vs 500 lm+20%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)91 m vs 89 m+2%
- Peak beam intensity2,070 cd vs 1,980 cd+5%
Why is TINI 2 better than E09R?
- Weight45 g vs 22 g2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,070 cd | 1,980 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 91 m | 89 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Osram P8 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Osram |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 280 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Titanium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | 47 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 25 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 18.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 45 g | 22 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
