- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E12 V2.0 vs i3T-Eos
Fenix E12 V2.0 vs Olight i3T-Eos
What E12 V2.0 does better (0) and where i3T-Eos wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is E12 V2.0 better than i3T-Eos?
E12 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is i3T-Eos better than E12 V2.0?
- Maximum output160 lm vs 180 lm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 160 lm | 180 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,160 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 68 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 76.6 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 19 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.6 mm | — |
| Weight | 27 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
