- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E12 V3.0 vs SW05R-UV
Fenix E12 V3.0 vs Fenix SW05R-UV
What E12 V3.0 does better (4) and where SW05R-UV wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E12 V3.0SW05R-UV
| E12 V3.0 | SW05R-UV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 81.5 mm | 69 mm | +12.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 29 mm | −9.7 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.4 mm | 16 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 54 g | 55 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E12 V3.0 better than SW05R-UV?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)78 m vs 39 m2×
- Peak beam intensity1,520 cd vs 380 cd4×
- Maximum runtime100 h vs 49 h2×
- Maximum output200 lm vs 150 lm+33%
Why is SW05R-UV better than E12 V3.0?
- RechargeableNo · E12 V3.0: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 200 lm | 150 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,520 cd | 380 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 78 m | 39 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,000K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 700 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 100 h | 49 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 81.5 mm | 69 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 29 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 17.4 mm | 16 mm |
| Weight | 54 g | 55 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
