How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,201 models · updated Oct 26, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E12 V3.0 vs W2R

Fenix E12 V3.0 vs Ledlenser W2R

What E12 V3.0 does better (2) and where W2R wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Fenix E12 V3.0
Fenix · 2024E12 V3.0
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
Ledlenser W2R
Ledlenser · 2023W2R
5.1Score
2 advantages≈ $25
2.6Brightness & throw2.7
6.8Battery & charging6.7
9.4Build & durability4.8
5.9Features5.9

Why is E12 V3.0 better than W2R?

  1. Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. Weight54 g vs 61 g+13%

Why is W2R better than E12 V3.0?

  1. Maximum output200 lm vs 220 lm+10%
  2. RechargeableNo · E12 V3.0: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix E12 V3.0Fenix E12 V3.0≈ $306.2
Ledlenser W2RLedlenser W2R≈ $255.1
Light output
Maximum output200 lm220 lm
Peak beam intensity1,520 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)78 m—
Light sourceLEDCOB LED panel
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-20—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs—1
Colour temperature4,000K6,000K
Battery & charging
BatteryAABuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Maximum runtime100 h—
RechargeableNoYes
USB-C charging—Yes
Charging time—2.5 h
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Body materialAluminiumPlastic / polymer
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Pocket clipYesYes
Can tail-standYes—
Size & weight
Length / height81.5 mm176 mm
Head diameter / width19.3 mm—
Body diameter / depth17.4 mm—
Weight54 g61 g
Modes & features
SwitchTail switch—
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare