- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E18R V2.0 vs Angel Eyes E200
Fenix E18R V2.0 vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E200
What E18R V2.0 does better (3) and where Angel Eyes E200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Brightness & throw3.4
8.7Battery & charging5.4
9.4Build & durability7.8
7.9Light quality4.0
5.9Features5.9
Why is E18R V2.0 better than Angel Eyes E200?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)146 m vs 118 m+24%
- Peak beam intensity5,330 cd vs 3,480 cd+53%
- Brightness levels5 vs 4+25%
Why is Angel Eyes E200 better than E18R V2.0?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,650 lm+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,650 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 5,330 cd | 3,480 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 146 m | 118 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 47 |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 200 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 0.8 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 67 mm | — |
| Weight | 56 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 4 |
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
