- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E20 V2.0 vs LD15R
Fenix E20 V2.0 vs Fenix LD15R
What E20 V2.0 does better (3) and where LD15R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E20 V2.0LD15R
| E20 V2.0 | LD15R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 127 mm | 70 mm | +57 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 21 mm | 19 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 42 g | 40 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E20 V2.0 better than LD15R?
- Peak beam intensity3,970 cd vs 1,810 cd2.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)126 m vs 85 m+48%
- Maximum runtime200 h vs 110 h+82%
Why is LD15R better than E20 V2.0?
- Maximum output350 lm vs 500 lm+43%
- Weight42 g vs 40 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 350 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,970 cd | 1,810 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 126 m | 85 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Cree XP-G3 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 200 h | 110 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 127 mm | 70 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 21 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 16.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 42 g | 40 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 4 |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
