- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E20 V2.0 vs WF05E Intrinsically Safe
Fenix E20 V2.0 vs Fenix WF05E Intrinsically Safe
What E20 V2.0 does better (5) and where WF05E Intrinsically Safe wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Brightness & throw2.2
9.2Build & durability9.5
3.5Light quality2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
E20 V2.0WF05E Intrinsically Safe
| E20 V2.0 | WF05E Intrinsically Safe | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 127 mm | 134.5 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 21 mm | 19 mm | +2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 16.8 mm | 14.9 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 42 g | 37 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E20 V2.0 better than WF05E Intrinsically Safe?
- Maximum output350 lm vs 85 lm4.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)126 m vs 54 m2.3×
- Peak beam intensity3,970 cd vs 730 cd5.4×
- Maximum runtime200 h vs 80 h2.5×
- Brightness levels4 vs 3+33%
Why is WF05E Intrinsically Safe better than E20 V2.0?
- Weight42 g vs 37 g+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 350 lm | 85 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,970 cd | 730 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 126 m | 54 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Cree XP-G2 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AAA |
| Maximum runtime | 200 h | 80 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 127 mm | 134.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 21 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 16.8 mm | 14.9 mm |
| Weight | 42 g | 37 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 3 |
| Switch | Tail switch | Rotary / scroll wheel |
