- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E20 V2.0 vs MH11
Fenix E20 V2.0 vs Nitecore MH11
What E20 V2.0 does better (0) and where MH11 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is E20 V2.0 better than MH11?
E20 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is MH11 better than E20 V2.0?
- Maximum output350 lm vs 1,000 lm2.9×
- Peak beam intensity3,970 cd vs 8,930 cd2.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)126 m vs 189 m+50%
- Maximum runtime200 h vs 250 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 350 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,970 cd | 8,930 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 126 m | 189 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 200 h | 250 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 127 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 21 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 16.8 mm | — |
| Weight | 42 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
