- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E28R V2.0 vs E35 V3.0
Fenix E28R V2.0 vs Fenix E35 V3.0
What E28R V2.0 does better (3) and where E35 V3.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is E28R V2.0 better than E35 V3.0?
- Maximum runtime260 h vs 50 h5.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)273 m vs 240 m+14%
- Peak beam intensity18,630 cd vs 14,400 cd+29%
Why is E35 V3.0 better than E28R V2.0?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 3,000 lm+76%
- Weight128 g vs 67 g+91%
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+47%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,630 cd | 14,400 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 273 m | 240 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | Luminus SST-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 121 mm | 118 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 128 g | 67 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | Side switch | Side switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
