- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E28R V2.0 vs PL-850-300lm 312208
Fenix E28R V2.0 vs IVT PL-850-300lm 312208
What E28R V2.0 does better (1) and where PL-850-300lm 312208 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Brightness & throw2.8
Why is E28R V2.0 better than PL-850-300lm 312208?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 300 lm5.7×
Why is PL-850-300lm 312208 better than E28R V2.0?
PL-850-300lm 312208 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,630 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 273 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 121 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 128 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
