- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E28R V2.0 vs E52C
Fenix E28R V2.0 vs Nextorch E52C
What E28R V2.0 does better (3) and where E52C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E28R V2.0E52C
| E28R V2.0 | E52C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 121 mm | 153 mm | −32 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 30 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 130 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E28R V2.0 better than E52C?
- Maximum runtime260 h vs 65 h4×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)273 m vs 210 m+30%
- Peak beam intensity18,630 cd vs 11,025 cd+69%
Why is E52C better than E28R V2.0?
- Maximum output1,700 lm vs 3,000 lm+76%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,700 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,630 cd | 11,025 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 273 m | 210 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 260 h | 65 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 121 mm | 153 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26.5 mm | 30 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 22.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 128 g | 130 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
