- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E35 V3.0 vs PD35 V2.0 Digital
Fenix E35 V3.0 vs Fenix PD35 V2.0 Digital
What E35 V3.0 does better (2) and where PD35 V2.0 Digital wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Brightness & throw4.2
5.7Battery & charging9.7
9.6Build & durability8.8
7.9Light quality7.9
5.9Features5.9
Why is E35 V3.0 better than PD35 V2.0 Digital?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,000 lm3×
- Weight67 g vs 88 g+31%
Why is PD35 V2.0 Digital better than E35 V3.0?
- Maximum runtime50 h vs 430 h8.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 250 m+4%
- Peak beam intensity14,400 cd vs 15,620 cd+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,400 cd | 15,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 240 m | 250 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Cree XP-L HI |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 50 h | 430 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 118 mm | 138 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 25.4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23 mm |
| Weight | 67 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 5 |
| Switch | Side switch | Dual switches |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
