- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E35 V3.0 vs TK11 TAC
Fenix E35 V3.0 vs Fenix TK11 TAC
What E35 V3.0 does better (4) and where TK11 TAC wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is E35 V3.0 better than TK11 TAC?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+88%
- Weight67 g vs 114 g+70%
- Maximum runtime50 h vs 47.5 h+5%
- Brightness levels5 vs 3+67%
Why is TK11 TAC better than E35 V3.0?
- Peak beam intensity14,400 cd vs 28,060 cd+95%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 335 m+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,400 cd | 28,060 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 240 m | 335 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 50 h | 47.5 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 118 mm | 140 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 23.5 mm |
| Weight | 67 g | 114 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 3 |
| Switch | Side switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
