How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,011 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E35 V3.0 vs MH10 V2.0

Fenix E35 V3.0 vs Nitecore MH10 V2.0

What E35 V3.0 does better (3) and where MH10 V2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix E35 V3.0
Fenix · 2020E35 V3.0
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ $75
vs
Nitecore MH10 V2.0
Nitecore · 2021MH10 V2.0
8.8Score
1 advantage≈ $75
Higher score
5.8Brightness & throw4.7
6.2Battery & charging9.7
9.6Build & durability8.7
5.9Features5.9

Why is E35 V3.0 better than MH10 V2.0?

  1. Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,000 lm3×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 232 m+3%
  3. Weight67 g vs 75 g+12%

Why is MH10 V2.0 better than E35 V3.0?

  1. Maximum runtime50 h vs 520 h10.4×
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix E35 V3.0Fenix E35 V3.0≈ $758.6
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm1,000 lm
Peak beam intensity14,400 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m232 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-70—
LED makerLuminus—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion18650 Li-ion, CR123A
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime50 h520 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Submersible to—2 m
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height118 mm130 mm
Head diameter / width—25 mm
Weight67 g75 g
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchSide switch—
StrobeYesYes
SOS / beacon—Yes
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare