- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E35 V3.0 vs MH12 V2.0
Fenix E35 V3.0 vs Nitecore MH12 V2.0
What E35 V3.0 does better (3) and where MH12 V2.0 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is E35 V3.0 better than MH12 V2.0?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,200 lm2.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 202 m+19%
- Weight67 g vs 84 g+25%
Why is MH12 V2.0 better than E35 V3.0?
- Maximum runtime50 h vs 1,500 h30×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,400 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 240 m | 202 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 50 h | 1,500 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 118 mm | 158 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 25 mm |
| Weight | 67 g | 84 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
