How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. E35 V3.0 vs T102

Fenix E35 V3.0 vs Wuben T102

What E35 V3.0 does better (0) and where T102 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix E35 V3.0
Fenix · 2020E35 V3.0
8.6Score
0 advantages≈ $75
vs
Wuben T102
Wuben · 2019T102
9.0Score
1 advantage≈ $90
Higher score
5.3Brightness & throw8.1
5.7Battery & charging6.1
9.6Build & durability7.8

Why is E35 V3.0 better than T102?

E35 V3.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is T102 better than E35 V3.0?

  1. Maximum output3,000 lm vs 3,500 lm+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix E35 V3.0Fenix E35 V3.0≈ $758.6
Wuben T102Wuben T102≈ $909.0
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm3,500 lm
Peak beam intensity14,400 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-70Cree XHP70.2
LED makerLuminusCree
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Battery capacity5,000 mAh—
Maximum runtime50 h—
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height118 mm—
Weight67 g—
Modes & features
Brightness levels5—
SwitchSide switch—
StrobeYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare