- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E40R vs TK15R
Fenix E40R vs Fenix TK15R
What E40R does better (2) and where TK15R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E40RTK15R
| E40R | TK15R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 138 mm | 149 mm | −11 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 34 mm | +1 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26.4 mm | 25.4 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 206 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E40R better than TK15R?
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 3,200 lm+56%
- Maximum runtime89.5 h vs 68.3 h+31%
Why is TK15R better than E40R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)242 m vs 490 m2×
- Peak beam intensity14,640 cd vs 60,020 cd4.1×
- Weight220 g vs 206 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 3,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,640 cd | 60,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 242 m | 490 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 4 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 7,200K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 89.5 h | 68.3 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | 149 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26.4 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 206 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
