- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E40R vs TA21 IR
Fenix E40R vs Nextorch TA21 IR
What E40R does better (4) and where TA21 IR wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E40RTA21 IR
| E40R | TA21 IR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 138 mm | 98 mm | +40 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 32 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 97 g | +123 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E40R better than TA21 IR?
- Maximum output5,000 lm vs 1,300 lm3.8×
- Maximum runtime89.5 h vs 20 h4.5×
- Peak beam intensity14,640 cd vs 6,400 cd2.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)242 m vs 160 m+51%
Why is TA21 IR better than E40R?
- Weight220 g vs 97 g2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,000 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,640 cd | 6,400 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 242 m | 160 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 4 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 89.5 h | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 138 mm | 98 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 35 mm | 32 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 26.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 220 g | 97 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
