- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- GL07 vs NEXDOT WL15
Fenix GL07 vs Nextorch NEXDOT WL15
What GL07 does better (0) and where NEXDOT WL15 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Brightness & throw9.0
9.1Build & durability6.6
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
GL07NEXDOT WL15
| GL07 | NEXDOT WL15 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 66.3 mm | 78.5 mm | −12.2 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 28.2 mm | 36.5 mm | −8.3 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 31.6 mm | 32.5 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 73 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GL07 better than NEXDOT WL15?
GL07 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NEXDOT WL15 better than GL07?
- Peak beam intensity14,400 cd vs 44,100 cd3.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)240 m vs 420 m+75%
- Maximum output700 lm vs 1,200 lm+71%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 700 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 14,400 cd | 44,100 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 240 m | 420 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-12R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A, AAA | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A |
| Maximum runtime | 1 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 1 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66.3 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 28.2 mm | 36.5 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 31.6 mm | 32.5 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 73 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | Yes |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
