- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- GL19R V2.0 vs WL50
Fenix GL19R V2.0 vs Nextorch WL50
What GL19R V2.0 does better (4) and where WL50 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Brightness & throw5.6
3.5Battery & charging7.0
3.7Build & durability6.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
GL19R V2.0WL50
| GL19R V2.0 | WL50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 94 mm | 125 mm | −31 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | 44 mm | −13 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 32 mm | 37 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 119 g | 135 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GL19R V2.0 better than WL50?
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 550 lm2.2×
- Peak beam intensity44,100 cd vs 15,620 cd2.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)420 m vs 250 m+68%
- Weight119 g vs 135 g+13%
Why is WL50 better than GL19R V2.0?
- Maximum runtime0.9 h vs 1.8 h2×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 550 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 44,100 cd | 15,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 420 m | 250 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | — | 2,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 0.9 h | 1.8 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 94 mm | 125 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | 44 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 32 mm | 37 mm |
| Weight | 119 g | 135 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Remote pressure switch |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
