- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL12R V2.0 vs NU25 MCT
Fenix HL12R V2.0 vs Nitecore NU25 MCT
What HL12R V2.0 does better (3) and where NU25 MCT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Brightness & throw5.0
5.4Battery & charging4.2
6.3Build & durability5.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is HL12R V2.0 better than NU25 MCT?
- Maximum runtime112 h vs 45 h2.5×
- Maximum output500 lm vs 400 lm+25%
- Battery capacity950 mAh vs 700 mAh+36%
Why is NU25 MCT better than HL12R V2.0?
- Weight73 g vs 50 g+46%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)125 m vs 132 m+6%
- Peak beam intensity3,910 cd vs 4,351 cd+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,910 cd | 4,351 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 125 m | 132 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 950 mAh | 700 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 112 h | 45 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx6 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 56 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 40 mm | — |
| Weight | 73 g | 50 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black, White |
