- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL12R V2.0 vs UT27 MCT
Fenix HL12R V2.0 vs Nitecore UT27 MCT
What HL12R V2.0 does better (0) and where UT27 MCT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Brightness & throw6.7
5.4Battery & charging6.0
6.3Build & durability4.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is HL12R V2.0 better than UT27 MCT?
HL12R V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is UT27 MCT better than HL12R V2.0?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 800 lm+60%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)125 m vs 167 m+34%
- Peak beam intensity3,910 cd vs 6,970 cd+78%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,910 cd | 6,970 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 125 m | 167 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 950 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 112 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx6 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 56 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 40 mm | — |
| Weight | 73 g | 74 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Dual switches |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
