- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL18R-T V2.0 vs HC60 UHE
Fenix HL18R-T V2.0 vs Nitecore HC60 UHE
What HL18R-T V2.0 does better (1) and where HC60 UHE wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Brightness & throw7.4
7.5Battery & charging8.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is HL18R-T V2.0 better than HC60 UHE?
- Weight103 g vs 140 g+36%
Why is HC60 UHE better than HL18R-T V2.0?
- Maximum output800 lm vs 1,600 lm2×
- Battery capacity1,900 mAh vs 4,000 mAh2.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)125 m vs 157 m+26%
- Peak beam intensity3,910 cd vs 6,170 cd+58%
- Maximum runtime160 h vs 200 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,910 cd | 6,170 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 125 m | 157 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-25 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 6 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 80 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | 18650 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | 1,900 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 160 h | 200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 57.5 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 47 mm | — |
| Weight | 103 g | 140 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
