- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL18R-T vs Hl-Sf
Fenix HL18R-T vs Milwaukee Hl-Sf
What HL18R-T does better (3) and where Hl-Sf wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is HL18R-T better than Hl-Sf?
- Maximum runtime43 h vs 25 h+72%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
- Maximum output500 lm vs 450 lm+11%
Why is Hl-Sf better than HL18R-T?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)82 m vs 100 m+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 450 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,680 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 82 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G3 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 4,100K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 3 | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 1,300 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 43 h | 25 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 68.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 39.5 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 3 | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | Red | — |
