- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL32R-T vs ISHL-LED
Fenix HL32R-T vs Milwaukee ISHL-LED
What HL32R-T does better (3) and where ISHL-LED wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is HL32R-T better than ISHL-LED?
- Maximum output800 lm vs 310 lm2.6×
- Maximum runtime150 h vs 8 h18.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)132 m vs 100 m+32%
Why is ISHL-LED better than HL32R-T?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 800 lm | 310 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 4,360 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 132 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | 150 h | 8 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Magnesium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | 66 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 45 mm | — |
| Weight | 107 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Red | Yellow |
