- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM50R V2.0 vs NU43
Fenix HM50R V2.0 vs Nitecore NU43
What HM50R V2.0 does better (1) and where NU43 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Brightness & throw6.3
4.4Battery & charging8.5
9.3Build & durability5.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM50R V2.0 better than NU43?
- Weight78 g vs 116 g+49%
Why is NU43 better than HM50R V2.0?
- Maximum output700 lm vs 1,400 lm2×
- Maximum runtime42 h vs 165 h3.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)115 m vs 130 m+13%
- Peak beam intensity3,310 cd vs 3,800 cd+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 700 lm | 1,400 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 3,310 cd | 3,800 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 115 m | 130 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XP-G3 | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 5,900K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 42 h | 165 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 64 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 36 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 32 mm | — |
| Weight | 78 g | 116 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
