- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM53R vs eStar
Fenix HM53R vs Nextorch eStar
What HM53R does better (2) and where eStar wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
HM53ReStar
| HM53R | eStar | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 71 mm | 63 mm | +8 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 37 mm | 46 mm | −9 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | 36 mm | = |
| Weight | 102 g | 87 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HM53R better than eStar?
- Maximum runtime135 h vs 115 h+17%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is eStar better than HM53R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)158 m vs 205 m+30%
- Peak beam intensity6,240 cd vs 10,506 cd+68%
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 1,300 lm+8%
- Weight102 g vs 87 g+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,300 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 6,240 cd | 10,506 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 158 m | 205 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-25 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion, 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 135 h | 115 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 71 mm | 63 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 37 mm | 46 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | 36 mm |
| Weight | 102 g | 87 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Stepless (ramping) brightness | — | Yes |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
