- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM53R vs Nao LT
Fenix HM53R vs Petzl Nao LT
What HM53R does better (4) and where Nao LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is HM53R better than Nao LT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)158 m vs 75 m2.1×
- Maximum output1,200 lm vs 600 lm2×
- Peak beam intensity6,240 cd vs 1,410 cd4.4×
- Maximum runtime135 h vs 85 h+59%
Why is Nao LT better than HM53R?
- Weight102 g vs 90 g+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 6,240 cd | 1,410 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 158 m | 75 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-25 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion, 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 135 h | 85 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 71 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 37 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | — |
| Weight | 102 g | 90 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
