- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM55R vs HA29 UHE MCT
Fenix HM55R vs Nitecore HA29 UHE MCT
What HM55R does better (4) and where HA29 UHE MCT wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Brightness & throw7.3
7.0Battery & charging7.9
7.9Build & durability7.8
7.7Light quality5.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM55R better than HA29 UHE MCT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)175 m vs 169 m+4%
- Maximum runtime147 h vs 122 h+20%
- Peak beam intensity7,660 cd vs 7,140 cd+7%
- Weight105 g vs 112 g+7%
Why is HA29 UHE MCT better than HM55R?
HA29 UHE MCT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,200 lm | 1,200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,660 cd | 7,140 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 175 m | 169 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-25 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18350 Li-ion | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 1,600 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 147 h | 122 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 64 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 34 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 44 mm | — |
| Weight | 105 g | 112 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
