- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM61R V2.0 vs ISHL-LED
Fenix HM61R V2.0 vs Milwaukee ISHL-LED
What HM61R V2.0 does better (3) and where ISHL-LED wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Brightness & throw3.7
6.8Build & durability8.8
Why is HM61R V2.0 better than ISHL-LED?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 310 lm5.2×
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 8 h37.5×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)162 m vs 100 m+62%
Why is ISHL-LED better than HM61R V2.0?
ISHL-LED has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 310 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 6,560 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 162 m | 100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,100K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AAA |
| Number of batteries | 2 | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 8 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 101 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | — |
| Weight | 152 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Yellow |
