- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM61R V2.0 vs rStar
Fenix HM61R V2.0 vs Nextorch rStar
What HM61R V2.0 does better (5) and where rStar wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Brightness & throw2.0
6.8Build & durability6.3
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
HM61R V2.0rStar
| HM61R V2.0 | rStar | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 101 mm | 133 mm | −32 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | 41 mm | +4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | 30 mm | +6 mm |
| Weight | 152 g | 50 g | +102 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HM61R V2.0 better than rStar?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 80 lm20×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)162 m vs 10 m16.2×
- Peak beam intensity6,560 cd vs 40 cd164×
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 38 h7.9×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Why is rStar better than HM61R V2.0?
- Weight152 g vs 50 g3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 80 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 6,560 cd | 40 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 162 m | 10 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,100K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | AA |
| Number of batteries | 2 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 38 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Magnetic charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX4 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 101 mm | 133 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 45 mm | 41 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 36 mm | 30 mm |
| Weight | 152 g | 50 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
