- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM61R V3.0 vs Halo AL350C
Fenix HM61R V3.0 vs Fox Halo AL350C
What HM61R V3.0 does better (1) and where Halo AL350C wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Brightness & throw6.3
Why is HM61R V3.0 better than Halo AL350C?
- Maximum output1,800 lm vs 500 lm3.6×
Why is Halo AL350C better than HM61R V3.0?
Halo AL350C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,800 lm | 500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 9,510 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 195 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 1 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 105.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 38 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 51 mm | — |
| Weight | 168 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Motion / reactive sensor | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
