- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-DT Dual vs Hc35
Fenix HM65R-DT Dual vs Nitecore Hc35
What HM65R-DT Dual does better (3) and where Hc35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Brightness & throw7.5
8.4Battery & charging7.8
Why is HM65R-DT Dual better than Hc35?
- USB-C chargingYes · Hc35: No
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 134 m+27%
- Peak beam intensity7,220 cd vs 4,490 cd+61%
Why is Hc35 better than HM65R-DT Dual?
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 1,200 h4×
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 2,700 lm+80%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 2,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | 4,490 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 134 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion, 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A, AAA |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 1,200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Magnesium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 80 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 47 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 39 mm | — |
| Weight | 91 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
