- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-DT Dual vs HC65 MCT
Fenix HM65R-DT Dual vs Nitecore HC65 MCT
What HM65R-DT Dual does better (2) and where HC65 MCT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Brightness & throw9.1
8.4Battery & charging9.0
8.4Build & durability7.5
Why is HM65R-DT Dual better than HC65 MCT?
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 154 h+95%
- Weight91 g vs 146 g+60%
Why is HC65 MCT better than HM65R-DT Dual?
- Peak beam intensity7,220 cd vs 16,709 cd2.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 258 m+52%
- Maximum output1,500 lm vs 2,000 lm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,500 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | 16,709 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 258 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 8 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 98 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 3,000K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 154 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Magnesium | Magnesium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 80 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 47 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 39 mm | — |
| Weight | 91 g | 146 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
