- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs HF8R Core
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Ledlenser HF8R Core
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (2) and where HF8R Core wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Brightness & throw8.6
8.6Battery & charging6.3
7.6Build & durability2.4
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than HF8R Core?
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 90 h3.3×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Why is HF8R Core better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 210 m+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 210 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 90 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
