- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM65R-T V2.0 vs SWIFT LT
Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 vs Petzl SWIFT LT
What HM65R-T V2.0 does better (5) and where SWIFT LT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Brightness & throw3.6
8.6Battery & charging4.4
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM65R-T V2.0 better than SWIFT LT?
- Maximum output1,600 lm vs 380 lm4.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)170 m vs 70 m2.4×
- Peak beam intensity7,220 cd vs 1,220 cd5.9×
- Battery capacity3,400 mAh vs 880 mAh3.9×
- Maximum runtime300 h vs 60 h5×
Why is SWIFT LT better than HM65R-T V2.0?
- Weight140 g vs 43 g3.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 380 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 7,220 cd | 1,220 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 170 m | 70 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 120 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-40 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | 3,400 mAh | 880 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 300 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 43 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
