- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM71R V2.0 vs ZB9H
Fenix HM71R V2.0 vs Zweibrüder ZB9H
What HM71R V2.0 does better (5) and where ZB9H wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Brightness & throw9.3
9.5Battery & charging6.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM71R V2.0 better than ZB9H?
- Maximum runtime337 h vs 50 h6.7×
- Maximum output3,500 lm vs 2,000 lm+75%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)275 m vs 260 m+6%
- Weight220 g vs 252 g+15%
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
Why is ZB9H better than HM71R V2.0?
ZB9H has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,500 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 18,910 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 275 m | 260 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-60 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 337 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 111.5 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 50 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 53.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 220 g | 252 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
