- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM71R vs HP25R V2.0
Fenix HM71R vs Fenix HP25R V2.0
What HM71R does better (2) and where HP25R V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Brightness & throw8.8
9.2Battery & charging9.2
7.7Light quality8.7
5.9Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
HM71RHP25R V2.0
| HM71R | HP25R V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 106 mm | 60 mm | +46 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 46 mm | 47 mm | −1 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 45 mm | 33 mm | +12 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 238 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HM71R better than HP25R V2.0?
- Maximum output2,700 lm vs 1,600 lm+69%
- Weight208 g vs 238 g+14%
Why is HP25R V2.0 better than HM71R?
HP25R V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,700 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 13,220 cd | 13,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 230 m | 228 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | 5,700K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion |
| Maximum runtime | 400 h | 400 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 106 mm | 60 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 46 mm | 47 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 45 mm | 33 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 238 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 5 |
| Switch | — | Dual switches |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
