- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM71R vs HC65M V2.0
Fenix HM71R vs Nitecore HC65M V2.0
What HM71R does better (4) and where HC65M V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Brightness & throw8.3
9.1Battery & charging8.4
6.6Build & durability5.9
5.9Features5.9
Why is HM71R better than HC65M V2.0?
- Maximum runtime400 h vs 110 h3.6×
- Maximum output2,700 lm vs 1,750 lm+54%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)230 m vs 165 m+39%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Why is HC65M V2.0 better than HM71R?
HC65M V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,700 lm | 1,750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 13,220 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 230 m | 165 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 3 |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Number of batteries | 1 | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,500 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 400 h | 110 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 106 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 46 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 45 mm | — |
| Weight | 208 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
