- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM71R vs Nao RL
Fenix HM71R vs Petzl Nao RL
What HM71R does better (4) and where Nao RL wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is HM71R better than Nao RL?
- Maximum runtime400 h vs 80 h5×
- Maximum output2,700 lm vs 1,500 lm+80%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)230 m vs 200 m+15%
- Peak beam intensity13,220 cd vs 10,000 cd+32%
Why is Nao RL better than HM71R?
- Weight208 g vs 145 g+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,700 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 13,220 cd | 10,000 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 230 m | 200 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 1,440 min |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | — | Yes |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Adjustable colour temperature | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 400 h | 80 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 106 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 46 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 45 mm | — |
| Weight | 208 g | 145 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Motion / reactive sensor | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
