- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HM75R SE vs UT6 MCT
Fenix HM75R SE vs Nitecore UT6 MCT
What HM75R SE does better (1) and where UT6 MCT wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is HM75R SE better than UT6 MCT?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)223 m vs 195 m+14%
Why is UT6 MCT better than HM75R SE?
- Maximum runtime10 h vs 31 h3.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,600 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 9,510 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 223 m | 195 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 10 h | 31 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Magnesium |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | — |
