How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 11, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. HM75R vs UT2000

Fenix HM75R vs Nitecore UT2000

What HM75R does better (2) and where UT2000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Fenix HM75R
Fenix · 2024HM75R
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ $170
vs
Nitecore UT2000
Nitecore · 2026UT2000
9.3Score
2 advantages≈ $150
Higher score
9.0Brightness & throw9.0
8.1Battery & charging7.2
4.8Build & durability7.7
5.6Light quality9.2
5.9Features5.9

Why is HM75R better than UT2000?

  1. Maximum runtime234 h vs 55 h4.3×
  2. Peak beam intensity12,430 cd vs 12,126 cd+3%

Why is UT2000 better than HM75R?

  1. Weight321 g vs 122 g2.6×
  2. Maximum output1,600 lm vs 2,000 lm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix HM75RFenix HM75R≈ $1708.2
Nitecore UT2000Nitecore UT2000≈ $1509.3
Light output
Maximum output1,600 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity12,430 cd12,126 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)223 m220 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SST-40—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs2—
Colour rendering (CRI)—97
Colour temperature6,500K3,000K
Adjustable colour temperatureYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion, 18650 Li-ion—
Battery capacity—12,000 mAh
Maximum runtime234 h55 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Power bank functionYesYes
Build & durability
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)2 m2 m
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Weight321 g122 g
Modes & features
SwitchRotary / scroll wheel—
Red lightYesYes
Mode memoryYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare